Social media is a fairly new medium, so it’s no surprise that people gaffe from time to time when they try to execute it right. Of course, there’s a varying degree of severity between “Whoops, I posted the wrong link!” to “Oh my, I’ve done something so bad that I need to dig a hole and crawl in.” You might expect the latter from individuals or smaller companies, but when a big company slips on that level, it comes as a bit of a shock. And that is just what happened yesterday when the enormously high profile video game publisher Square Enix tried to use a Facebook game to promote their newest title in the Hitman game series.
Since the game itself depicts the adventures of an assassin, the Facebook game in question was a social device that allowed you to “put a hit” on friends. That’s already a little weird, but with the right comedic twist, I can see the potential for it. However, the faux pas came in the form of a drop down box that allowed you to specify the reason for the hit. The list included PC-unfriendly motivations such as “her muffin top” and “her bad hair,” but took the cake with “her small tits,” which is not only inappropriate language but sexist as hell to boot. Men weren’t left out of the insult war either, as “tiny penis” was also an option.
As expected, social media exploded over the app — in exactly the opposite way that Square intended. The app was pulled within hours, apologizing and they issued a statement saying they did not mean to offend their audience. The campaign was created by Emmy-award winning ad agency Ralph, who apparently don’t that cruelly making fun of people before shooting them in the face with a sniper rifle is much of an objection given the game’s “mature” audience.
Epic fail doesn’t even begin to describe the debacle here. While the newness of social media has made it a necessity for businesses to figure out how to connect with their consumers, it also means a lot of wandering into the creative unknown — which can yield stellar results or a landmine of bad PR. I keep trying to wrap my brain around how anyone greenlighted this thing, and no matter what angle I come at it from, I still can’t get a handle on it. Kudos to Square-Enix for reacting with lightning speed, removing the app less than an hour after it appeared, but how did it even get that far in the first place?
If you are trying to think of ways to use Facebook to engage your client that are cool but not over the top, it’s best to have a checklist handy. “No racial, ethical, or sexist slurs” is probably a great place to start, followed by “know your target audience.” In this case, sadly, the target audience MAY have found this app funny, as the 2011 demographicfor gaming shows that 53% of the people playing games are between the ages of 18-54. In other words, lots of teenagers that might not think twice about picking on a classmate for physical flaws. Sexism in gaming has recently drawn huge amounts of criticism over the rampant and violent misogyny that the medium and its consumers have tacitly encouraged for years. The fact that the company was willing to put their seal of approval on such a blatant example of juvenile asshattery shows that they’re tragically out of touch with the contemporary climate — not to mention ignorant of the disastrous PR effects on a brand that wading into these issues can provoke.
What do you think about Square Enix’s slipup? Can you think of any other social media disasters that have caused you to facepalm at the speed of light?
As an avid Tweeter, I’ve been excited about the launch of Medium since I first learned about the new site this summer. The promise of a service that bridges the gap between the 140 characters I already love and a more traditional blogging platform is one that excites both my passion for social media and my desire for a more directed writing channel. A traditional blog often seems like an exercise in futility for your average writer, but a system that is designed specifically for uncovering interesting posts — optimized for quality, rather than popularity — is one that I can certainly get behind. Medium founder Ev Williams took to the platform this week to discuss his new service’s functionality, and how editing and writing will work in the system.
Ev describes the service as truly a “what you see is what you get” interface, as opposed to the creation vs. preview mode favored by so many other blog publishing systems. I’ve used both Blogger and WordPress extensively for blogging and I can tell you with certainty that neither system comes even close to presenting a seamless WYSIWYG interface. The frustration that arises when you click “Preview” for the tenth time while attempting to align a photo just right is one that I am sure all novice bloggers are familiar with. The idea of eliminating that frustration entirely is immensely appealing.
Medium seeks to do more than just make blogging easier: it aims to reinvent digital publishing altogether. Beyond the aesthetic wonder of being able to edit the exact page you will publish, the service offers up a flexible range of post styles — you can publish just photos, just essays, or somewhere in between. My inner 13-year old envisions meaningful lines from my favorite songs attached to beautiful photos, and my slightly more rational (and significantly more jaded) 20-something self wants intelligent and argumentative pieces about why airlines should charge for carry-on luggage. Ev utilizes both of these styles in his own Medium collections, with topics ranging from “This Could Be Better” to “When I Was a Kid”. The options are virtually endless.
The platform was recently released to all Twitter employees, which hopefully indicates that they are moving toward letting more users into the beta platform. There has been no official launch date released yet, but as they add increased functionality and grow the user base, Medium will hopefully be ready for a universal launch in the coming months.
What do you think of Medium’s aims? Will they successfully revolutionize the digital media and blogging industry? Let us know your thoughts in the comments!
The weekend after Thanksgiving was one of the most aggressive marketing blitzes in recent memory. News reports had three shopping holidays to choose from: the venerable Black Friday, which started around 1961 but didn’t gain the influence it now has until as late as 2005; Small Business Saturday, a American Express-backed venture that took advantage of a Twitter hashtag in 2010 supporting local brick-and-mortars; and Cyber Monday, coined by the National Retail Federation in 2005. These three days have only been increasing in search volume and clout, and are now at the forefront of the holiday business season.
The IBM Reports
In today’s Big Data world, it’s easier than ever to analyze huge data sets and IBM was one of the first to get out a report on the buying weekend. Their Black Friday and Cyber Monday Reports are troves of information, giving website analytics data for e-commerce sites across a wide swath of industries. We were hipped to this data by Mashable, who curiously reported that Twitter yielded no revenue to these clients. It seems that despite massively ramped-up social advertising spending this year, leading BIA/Kelsey to project a 19.2% compound annual growth rate to 2016, social media sites only offered .34% of referrers on sales on Black Friday and .41% on Cyber Monday. Representing a loss in revenue of 35% and 24% respectively, it might seem that social was a dud.
However, between the three shopping days, over 447,000 people used the related hashtags, and millions more used less tech-savvy terms to talk about the events. Twitter, Facebook, and other social media sites have become utterly ubiquitous, combining with the adoption of social media by people who are wealthy enough to buy the majority of gifts for the holidays — that is, parents. Was all that marketing a waste? Or was social media part of a wider sales strategy that led to an annual e-commerce sales growth of 20% on Black Friday and 30% on Cyber Monday?
Did View-Through Traffic Matter?
My immediate thought when looking at this data was that social media was being discounted, as it often is an intermediary step between product research and buying that product. Especially during sales, users will shop around, compare products, and come to the same retailer through a variety of advertising channels. Much like paid search and organic social media posts, the buying cycle can be particularly long, especially when all of your competitors are also vying for your customers.
But even clicks aren’t particularly valuable as a metric, as many saw these deals passively through advertisements and posts in their feed. Social media acts similarly to television ads, giving snippets of information to raise interest. This kind of passive brand-building is hard to track, but certainly affects users by letting them know that there’s a sale and they should check out the site for more deals, leading to businesses over-valuing direct rather than social media traffic. While this kind of analysis is difficult, businesses have to use impression-based attribution to track the ROI of social media.
The Power of Email
Also left out of IBM’s analysis is email. We’ve all seen our inboxes swell with bacn as the buying season approached, warning us of the deals to come on all the sites that have acquired our email at some point. Major retailers carpet-bombed our inboxes, leaving hundreds of subject lines for us to click or ignore. Many marketers champion email as a much more effective use of marketing spend that users prefer to social media advertising. Why did IBM choose to ignore the direct-mail campaigns in their study?
Did You Know?
Regardless of their flaws, the IBM reports are a wealth of data for marketers both in e-commerce and keeping track of the information to strengthen their own marketing campaigns. Some key takeaways:
Photo sharing service Instagram announced the release of brand new web profiles for all users last week, some two years after the launch of its iOS app. Although this is big news for your average Instagrammer, the addition is also a major breakthrough for businesses who use the app for photo editing and social sharing. The new web profiles have already begun launching, and the majority of Instagram users can expect a new profile featuring their photos within the coming week.
Not only does the new functionality improve a business’s ability to monitor and respond to comments on photos, it also adds the ability to direct users on other networks to follow your account. Previously, it was difficult to encourage fans to follow your account within the app-only software because there was no easy way to find individual profiles without manually searching. The new web profiles add the “Follow” function directly on each individual profile, which allow businesses to link easily to their page and improve their reach. This new feature will also allow customers who do not have Instagram accounts to see your photo stream without downloading the app.
The web profile layout is extremely similar to Facebook, with one major exception: no news feed. In order to view a user’s profile, you have to manually go to instagram.com/[username] or click a direct link. It seems likely that there may be some sort of “explore” or feed feature in the future, but as of right now it can only be used to directly visit pages. You can click on user profiles of people who comment or like your photos, which would allow businesses to follow back people who interact with their brand.
The new design also includes a follow button on individual photos, so Instagram users can easily add other users to their feed from photos sourced elsewhere, such as Pinterest, Facebook, Twitter, and Tumblr. I’ve already seen some businesses showing off their new web profile pages on Facebook, with links back to the page for maximum follow value. The integration of that button should help increase Instagram follower counts significantly for many business pages.
All in all, the new design seems destined to help more users reach your business page, and will hopefully lead to increased interaction for your Instagram photos. With a little self-promotion on other social networks, Instagram profiles can now easily reach wider audiences, and showcase your brand’s identity to more potential customers. Has your business gotten a web profile yet? Check it out, and let us know what you think!
In the modern world, there’s tremendous emphasis on finding a romantic partner. As if we didn’t get enough pressure from literature about star-crossed lovers, movies about pairing up, and images splayed across glossy magazine pages depicting blissful partners holding hands and gazing into the sunset, now Facebook has decided to join the bandwagon with a new addition. It’s called Profiles for Couples, and it gives you an excellent opportunity to show the world that you have indeed achieved putting off old maiddom for the time being.
Scorn aside, the general reaction to this new addition has caused some negativity. CNN documented some of the more extreme reactions in a recent post. Profiles for Couples is actually not anything wildly innovative: Facebook Friendship Pages work in a similar fashion and have been around for years. If you go to any friend’s page, click the gear icon next to “message,” and choose “See Friendship,” you’ll see a page that shows the way you and said friend have interacted over time, including when you became friends on Facebook, posts, events you both attended, and more.
An update like this tends to draw bitterness out of some and happiness from others, and funny enough, I think users’ reactions to it are much more significant than Facebook’s decision to make the change itself. Much like Facebook Friendship Pages, Profiles for Couples aren’t in your face — you have to navigate your way to them. Facebook is taking information you provide and assembling it to show a timeline, sure, and some people seem pissed about that. But it’s information you provide: if you don’t want it to exist, you have the option of not listing your relationship status on the site.
“You cannot deactivate the pages, but you can control what you share on Facebook using the privacy settings for each post,” Facebook’s Jessie Baker told CNN. “The friendship page respects the privacy setting of each post. This means the person viewing the friendship page may see each post elsewhere on Facebook, like on either friend’s timeline or in news feed. You can curate your friendship page by hiding stories you do not want to appear.”
For private types who don’t like their love lives chronicled across Facebook, these changes may draw some ire. Personally, the idea of setting up a page like this in place of a personal one does bother me, and because personal individuality is important whether you are married or not. Still, for those who opt to immerse their online identity in coupledom, it’s certainly their prerogative. On the other hand, the comedic value could be classic. Rather than sites like Lamebook having to keep an eye out for couples catfighting over the social network, they can now just surf over the the couples page and screencap the whole thing.
Nothing gets the honeys' hearts thumping like Senor Cardgage.While these couples pages seem fundamentally gag-worthy, they can provide a nice repository of the exchanges between you and your sweetie — viewing those memories is a great way to reconnect with your past (and that one Strong Bad cartoon you posted on their wall in 2007). But why not just leave that to the domain of “view friendship” pages? What makes romantic coupledom so important that it has to get its own specialized feature that already existed in the Facebook UI? The answer, of course, is pleasing the crowd: ever since the disastrous IPO, the ‘book has been frantically trying to connect with users on every level possible. Time will tell if their efforts are successful in retaining the goodwill of its 800 million strong user base.
Are you offended by the idea of couples pages, or indifferent?
At some point during the endless presidential election of 2012, you probably shared a political opinion on Facebook that you were wholly unqualified to advance. Facebook is one of those great and terrible places where totally uninformed people can share their feelings with everyone they know. There’s just no room for actual rational argument on Facebook — at least, that’s the biggest thing that I’ve learned during this past election cycle.
Here are five other things I learned about politics from reading my Facebook feed:
Everybody has an opinion, and you better not disagree with it.
Did you study political science in college? Do you have a degree in economics? Do you even know anything about the tenets of national socialism? No? Doesn’t matter.
Facts and emotions rarely align, especially when social media is involved. Your aunt, uncle, grandmother, high school classmate, co worker, and friend from the coffee house all know that they are absolutely correct. If you want to remain Facebook friends with any of them, the best thing to do is do not engage when they proclaim that a vote for Romney is a vote for the Lizard People, or that President Obama is going to sell the entire country to Lithuania.
Just smile and back away while not making any sudden movements.
Sometimes it’s legitimately difficult to tell if someone is joking.
I enjoy a well formed joke just as much as everyone else. I think it’s incredibly funny that Republicans took to referring to anything Obama said as “Obamaloney,” specifically because it reads as “Oba Maloney.” I came very close to writing a killer post about how everyone should leave my good old uncle Oba Maloney alone.
But then I realized I was opening myself up to anyone who could possibly interpret the obvious hilarity in a way that I hadn’t intended. That unwritten post probably would have ended up with as many comments from people choosing to expound on the truthiness of the President’s latest statements as from people who enjoyed the scintillating wordplay on my part.
Seriously, Oba Maloney. That just cracks me up.
When people say they are moving to another country on Facebook, they probably should.
Do you bloviate endlessly about the heinous misdeeds of those big bad meanies on the other side? Do you attack and browbeat anyone who opposes anything you hold to be true? Do you think women need to use birth control each and every time they have sex, and that having a prescription for birth control automatically makes a woman a prostitute? (Okay, that last one is optional.)
You are not a unique and special snowflake. You are not influencing anybody’s vote in any way. There is simply not a single scenario wherein one of those mythical “undecided voters” chose one side over the other because of a well-placed status update.
You have every right to express your political opinion on Facebook. I just want to let you know that it doesn’t matter. The people who agree with you may like it, and the people who disagree with you may remove you from their newsfeed. You will not, however, have any impact on the Electoral College at all. Sorry to burst your bubble.
Your friends hate it when you talk about politics on Facebook.
Seriously. This is always, always, always true. The only people who are worse than the self-appointed Facebook pundits are the idiots who shake yard signs at drivers in the middle of busy intersections on election day.
The bottom line is, while Facebook is a tool for personal networking, it’s no venue for political discourse. By keeping the commentating to yourself, you can avoid a whole lot of headaches and maintain your personal brand. Now that the election is over, let’s all find other things to talk about and fight about on Facebook. Like how Mickey Mouse bought George Lucas. Please?
My name is Steve Maloney, and I approved this message. Now go share it on Facebook.
They Took Our Fans!Last week, a small ripple went through the Dangerous Minds blog, crying out “I WANT MY FRIENDS BACK!” Letting out a screed of massive proportions, the piece has made its rounds on the very social network it lambasts, even having some of the 59,502 fans replace their profile pictures with the header image. But like most widely-circulated rants, the post is largely sound and fury, signifying nothing.
Facebook celebrity George Takei had been complaining about this “problem” enough to hit the Wall Street Journal this past June. And while earlier this month Facebook extended their Promoted Posts to individual users, Pages have had the option since late May, and the feature’s older cousin Sponsored Stories have been around since January of 2011. Even more striking is that as early as December 2010, only a small subset of your fans would see your posts, and Facebook was then using an impression count, which seems inflated compared to the Reach metric we see today.
If none of this seems particularly recent, then the frustration from savvy marketers about articles of this ilk is understandable. However, two notable sources, Facebook statisticians EdgeRank Checker and marketing patriarch Oglivy-Mather, show a recent decrease in reach centering around an algorithm change on Sept 20, 2012. For history’s sake, there appeared to be a much more significant drop in impressions in 2011. We don't see the same drop in these four clients.
Why Is This Happening?
An owner of a Page might be frustrated with this, and wonder what causes the low share of meaningful impressions. Blame EdgeRank.
EdgeRank, like a variety of other Ranks in the internet marketing world, is used to show content in a personalized but algorithmic way. These Ranks are often oversimplified into cute formal models, and EdgeRank is no different:
EdgeRank = ∑uwd
where u is the “affinity,” i.e. how much a user clicks, likes, or otherwise interacts with your page’s posts; w is the inherent weight of the type of Facebook post, leaning more heavily on images and videos than text posts or links; and d is the length of time it’s been since the post was made.
With EdgeRank, you may find your fans living in a shotgun filter bubble, and you may ask yourself, “How did I get here?” Each post has an individual EdgeRank with every user; therefore, a disengaged user base may yield lower than average reach, as the posts won’t have enough affinity with the users. A February webinar with Wildfire, now part of Google’s social team, showed an average of only 16% of page fans see a given post from a page.
What Can I Do?
Facebook has increasingly been giving page owners (and, by extension, business owners) paid options to increase their posts’ reach — but before any money is spent, optimizing your posting schedule for EdgeRank goes a long way.
From Dangerous Minds:
At Dangerous Minds, we post anywhere from 10 to 16 items per day, fewer on the weekends. To reach 100% of of our 50k+ Facebook fans they’d charge us $200 per post. That would cost us between $2000 and $3200 per day…
The first thing that stuck in my mind from the original post was that they were clearly using a shotgun approach to their Facebook posting. Unlike in organic SEO, blasting a relatively large number of pieces of content has little benefit — you’re diluting the relative EdgeRanks of your posts by ensuring that few see each individual post and can’t give you the engagement needed to raise your overall affinity. This kind of shotgun approach can be profitable when a page has a large number of fans, but for most pages a more relaxed 2-3 posts per day allow overall affinity to accumulate on valuable posts. Less engaging links can be foregone in the social media strategy for organic sharing by users who click around after reading the shared post, i.e. those that will have a higher chance of viral sharing.
Moreover, Dangerous Minds posts largely links, which are among the lowest weighted edges, as they likely don’t produce the kinds of interactions that create even more high-value edges as images or videos would. They could easily follow the lead of many Facebook pages and post their links with an engaging image, increasing not only visual but algorithmic prominence in the News Feed.
See How Pretty, See How SmartFinally, the article’s code is missing high-value social meta tags that will lead to attractive display in the News Feed, missing out on high-value placement in the News Feed. Including og:description, especially one optimized for social media, lets you control the message introducing new users to your site and regular users to that piece of content. Using meta properties that were always part of OpenGraph but a newer recommendation from Facebook, app_id and fb_admins, provide a striking, clickable, and brand-reinforcing display in the News Feeds of the most important group for expanding your fanbase: friends of fans.
Sponsored and Promoted
No matter how much you optimize your posts and website to hoard EdgeRank, you may want to spend some money. There are two alliterative ways to promote your posts to a wider audience: Promoted Posts and Sponsored Stories. The two methods are similar in effect, but wildly different in terms of management.
Sponsored Stories, now an elder statesman of Facebook advertising, runs an ad that shows in the top of the sidebar and in the News Feed. You can choose your interest and location targeting and bid for this ad, and the overall budget and duration for the campaign. This kind of ad is perfect for exposing your brand to people who might not even be aware of it, and when well-targeted can lead to click-through rates of over 5% on a reach of thousands or more. Again, a well-optimized Facebook post is necessary to make it clear to the user what they’ll be clicking on, but your strongest weapon is targeting.
There are a two types of Sponsored Stories which can be run individually or in tandem. The first is a flat ad, displayed to users in your target; the second is a “Like Ad,” giving prominence to stories created by actions taken on your posts. Which one you choose depends on your goal: expanding your reach to people who aren’t brand-aware, or pushing to your fans’ friends, who might be acquainted with your brand, but haven’t seen your content before. To make management easy, you can set the Sponsored Story to automatically update with your most recent post, and the overall monthly cost can be as low as $500 for blanket saturation of your target market.
Left: Regular "Flat" Ad. Right: Interaction "Like" Ad
Promoted Posts are the simpler, easier way to run Sponsored Stories that only show in the organic News Feed area. By running a Promoted Post, you create 3 Sponsored Stories targeted to the areas that your fans are from. Two of these ads are post ads, targeted to your fans and friends of fans; the other one is a Like Ad. You can’t edit these ads’ targeting, making them a little unwieldy if you have a broad fanbase with friends outside your target area, and the ads only run for a few days; however, the easy setup lets you get on with your day and promote only the posts you want. It’s also harder to identify these posts as ads, avoiding issues from ad-blockers and other tech-savvy users’ plugins.
If you have the time to manage it, I personally feel that Sponsored Stories are better for most pages because you can control targeting, run ads for longer, and combine with other ads to best draw traffic, interactions, and fans. However, Promoted Posts are great for those who are on a limited budget and looking to avoid losing themselves in overt advertising.
Get Your Fans Back!
No, Facebook isn’t taking your fans, at least any more than they usually did. No, you don’t have to use any paid solutions to reach your fans. No, paid ads aren’t anything more than a way to reach those who wouldn’t normally have seen your content. And no, paying for placement and reach won’t make up for content that isn’t shareable.
Your first steps to getting your fans back is to optimize your posts, schedule and strategy, and website for social media. Then boost content that “sticks” by shrewd, instead of blanket, Promotion and Sponsoring. Finally, spit-shine your boots and watch engagement, reach, and impressions climb.
Just like all of you, I spend a sizeable portion of my day with Facebook open in one of the many tabs of my Google Chrome browser. I do it for work; other typical explanations include social media addiction, boredom, or a bad case of the Mondays. Either way, I’m confident that a great majority of people that spent any time on social media on Monday caught a great deal of images, comments, posts, updates, and tweets related to Hurricane Sandy.
Among all the hullabaloo there were several images that began to circulate rather quickly, including an inundated Tomb of the Unknown Soldier and various New York City skylines cowering under ominous-looking masses of cloud. As it turns out, most of these images are fake. Not fake as in they never happened fake — fake as in, those photos had nothing to do with Hurricane Sandy fake.
Amazing, inspiring, fake photos.
This image was actually a normal picture of the Statue of Liberty, Photoshopped against the background of a 2004 Nebraska storm.People share viral pieces for different reasons. We’ve all had the “Oh, you haven’t seen _______ yet? You have to check it out!” conversation. The very point of social media is to share compelling content with our friends (both literal and metaphorical), and that won’t change. But with the sensationalistic and incorrect information that gains legs during this kind of huge story, how do users start shaking out the details? More importantly, does a willingness to instantly share a doctored photo reflect poorly on your own (or, Heaven forbid, your business’s) credibility?
It wasn’t long after the first round of photos circulated through the interwebs that articles began to identify these photos as the phonies that they were. I’ll be honest — I saw some of the photos on my own feed and thought they were fantastic. It didn’t even cross my mind that they were fake.
This image was taken from the poster for the 2004 environmental disaster film The Day After Tomorrow.Here’s where the social Internet’s famed capacity for instantaneous reaction kicks in and things get interesting. Those who resisted the allure of the initial photo insta-share were all too happy to spread the damning info, and those who initially shared the photos suffered the e-stigma of falling for a hoax — followers of the accounts who spread the tainted photos are surely feeling exasperated at their friends’ willingness to hop on the bandwagon. As in the Kony 2012 debacle, sensationalistic content is tempting to share, but if it turns out to be false your followers may have a real problem with your willingness to mislead them. Love it or hate it, the Internet is a breeding ground for high-speed rumor-mongering, but we’re now also allowed high-speed debunking — which can lead to a crucial loss of credibility in your networks.
Does the question of journalistic responsibility come into play with regard to such a disconnected network as the social media sphere? Can we just assume that eventually the truth will prevail? The actual source often becomes so removed from the images that go viral that it’s hard to tell what’s what. Some will always be quick to share, and others quick to skepticism. While news stories of this magnitude offer an unparalleled opportunity for organic, viral sharing, it’s important to remember that the Internet’s capacity for tweaking or losing the truth entirely is mighty — if you try to harness the power of a breaking news story, pay attention to your sources or you may find yourself losing social (media) capital.
What fake viral media has affected you recently? Have you found yourself unwittingly sharing a less-than-veritable tidbit, and what were your followers’ reactions?
Folks, here is a lesson in homegrown social media success. While it has long been known as an obsession of my generation, it can be difficult for just-starting-out businesses to learn how to grapple with this fact and to lasso it into a useful tool for getting non-virtual dollars into their budgets. At this point, we know of the tried-and-true ways for businesses to use social media for their benefit — primarily, starting conversations with customers or potential customers, generating interest, and responding to complaints. We also know there are ways to do it wrong. But who knew it could also be a way to attract investors? Local health-conscious delivery joint Naked Pizza, based right here in New Orleans, has been having tremendous success with social media via their quirky and attention-grabbing Twitter tactics.
Naked’s Twitter account, currently boasting nearly 19 thousand followers, is a perfect example of the ways that creative community-building via social media can spell big success for the savvy small business owner. By following a social media strategy that was true to their brand (read: quirky and fun) they began picking up the attention of investors. 8000 investment inquires, to be exact.
So what does Naked Pizza do different? The primary goal of social media is to get people talking about your product, in hopes that it will be higher on their radar, and they will be more likely or encouraged to buy your product when it comes time to make a sale. It’s a soft sale: phrases like “buy now” are a too-obvious faux pas. The best way to leverage social media is to start a conversation, so don’t be afraid to be funny or silly to make a connection with your fans or followers! That’s exactly what Naked Pizza has done so well. Tweets like, “Early Olympians wore no artificial clothing containing freaky chemicals… why should your pizza? Order now: http://nakedpizza.biz” and “LIVNAKED blog post! Do spider monkeys hold the key to why we get fat? http://ow.ly/1iYuK2” keep fans interested and engaged. (It goes without saying, of course, that having an official branded blog to link to doesn’t hurt either.) Fans share pictures of their pizza — Instagrammed, of course — and tweet about the ensuring delicious meal. There’s a direct conversation happening; Naked Pizza retweets their followers and asks direct questions to individuals. And frankly, they are doing a great job. After looking through their Twitter for about 10 minutes, I know what I’m having for lunch. Congrats to the booming pizza-crafters, and bon appetite to their many followers!
What other companies do you love to follow on Twitter?
Since its initial launch in 2006, social media goliath Twitter has expanded into a vital part of our daily lives, 140 characters at a time. The microblogging platform provides a flexible platform for 14-year-old Jessica to share her flirtatious encounter with the boy from 3rd period Science while simultaneously hosting serious discussion and real-time world events. Twitter even feeds our celebrity obsession, allowing fans an interactive look into their favorite celeb’s personal life.
If your topic is hot enough, this constant influx of viewer traffic translates to millions of potential eyes on your company’s product information. A good example of this was the marital dispute between Oprah-proclaimed “king” of Twitter, Ashton Kutcher (@aplusk), and his former wife Demi Moore (@justdemi). The couple brought their issues to the public eye by posting comments, photos, and replies to both each other and their fans throughout the ongoing affair. While it’s unlikely that small businesses have the starpower of a dramatic split between two A-list celebrities, a compelling storyline and personal interaction can go a long way in drawing attention to your message.
Twitter has been instrumental is social movements as well. Millions of tweets were broadcasted during the initial stages of last year’s “Occupy” movement, in addition to being an invaluable source of real-time information broadcasting in the wave of revolution that became known as the “Arab Spring” in late 2010. Even journalists began tweeting updates on current situations when access to their media sources was unavailable. Poignantly, renowned journalist and filmmaker Tim Hetherington’s last words were shared via his mobile Twitter app for iPhone.
Clearly, Twitter makes a dynamic impact on modern-day society. But how can you put this force to work for your business?
Start with choosing a good handle. This name will be what consumers use to @ reply and retweet your posts. Therefore, the name should adequately reflect your company, as well as be simple and catchy enough for people to remember. Make sure to do your research on this aspect. This name is shown next to your profile, and is typically what directly draws search results. Therefore, you might want to consider looking at which variations of your company’s keywords receives the best monthly search traffic before deciding on a name.
This same optimization should be used for posted tweets as well. The first 42 characters of each post are devoted to the tweet’s title tag and account name, which directly affect search results. Keep in mind that Google will still index the rest of the characters in the tweet.
If you provide links in your tweets, make sure that the copy consumers are directed to is accurate, helpful information as well. Good links will be shared across various accounts — but not if viewers are forced to search through your site to find the information they need.
Using Twitter to promote your business is an easy, free way to bring attention to your company. Find out if tapping into the social media storm that surrounds Twitter could be a beneficial tool in your SEO arsenal—it’s only a click away.