<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: My Space&#8217;s Tom Anderson gives Google+ a stamp of approval	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://townsend.bunksite.com/my-spaces-tom-anderson-gives-google-a-stamp-of-approval/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://townsend.bunksite.com/my-spaces-tom-anderson-gives-google-a-stamp-of-approval/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 14:48:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Tim Coleman		</title>
		<link>https://townsend.bunksite.com/my-spaces-tom-anderson-gives-google-a-stamp-of-approval/#comment-1112</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Coleman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 14:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchinfluence.com/?p=6608#comment-1112</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[While I&#039;m impressed with Google+ so far, it does have a user base problem, it&#039;s difficult to get most people to migrate over.  As they tell me, I already have Facebook, why go through the hassle to have Facebook on Google, interesting point.

To add to Will Scott&#039;s comment above, I would include Buzz in with the list of Google failures, which was clearly aimed at Twitter.  Speaking of Twitter that seems to be the silent grower in the social media world, new funding, new employees, growing user base, staying out of the war and a new picture function.  Increased stability across the board, they are doing their thing and doing it well and as a whole are being ignored since the G+ introduction.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I&#8217;m impressed with Google+ so far, it does have a user base problem, it&#8217;s difficult to get most people to migrate over.  As they tell me, I already have Facebook, why go through the hassle to have Facebook on Google, interesting point.</p>
<p>To add to Will Scott&#8217;s comment above, I would include Buzz in with the list of Google failures, which was clearly aimed at Twitter.  Speaking of Twitter that seems to be the silent grower in the social media world, new funding, new employees, growing user base, staying out of the war and a new picture function.  Increased stability across the board, they are doing their thing and doing it well and as a whole are being ignored since the G+ introduction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Will Scott		</title>
		<link>https://townsend.bunksite.com/my-spaces-tom-anderson-gives-google-a-stamp-of-approval/#comment-1111</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Will Scott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 03:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchinfluence.com/?p=6608#comment-1111</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A little irony in the posthumous stamp of approval from MySpace-land?

Google doesn&#039;t have the greatest track-record in this space:
 - Orkut
 - Wave
 - HotPot &#060;-dumbest name ever.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A little irony in the posthumous stamp of approval from MySpace-land?</p>
<p>Google doesn&#8217;t have the greatest track-record in this space:<br />
 &#8211; Orkut<br />
 &#8211; Wave<br />
 &#8211; HotPot &lt;-dumbest name ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: townsend.bunksite.com @ 2026-06-16 10:55:32 by W3 Total Cache
-->