<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Is Google Ignoring Your Backlinks? Webmaster Tools Can (Maybe) Help (Sometimes)	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://townsend.bunksite.com/google-ignoring-backlinks-webmaster-tools-might-help-well-sometimes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://townsend.bunksite.com/google-ignoring-backlinks-webmaster-tools-might-help-well-sometimes/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 17:53:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Israel Kendall		</title>
		<link>https://townsend.bunksite.com/google-ignoring-backlinks-webmaster-tools-might-help-well-sometimes/#comment-1086</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Israel Kendall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 17:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchinfluence.com/?p=5849#comment-1086</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://townsend.bunksite.com/google-ignoring-backlinks-webmaster-tools-might-help-well-sometimes/#comment-1085&quot;&gt;Scott Shockley&lt;/a&gt;.

Scott, thanks for the reply! I just found the strangest backlink and I&#039;ve been searching all over to find out if it will count for anything. I&#039;m not sure if Google can even see the page I was linked from because I can&#039;t see it. It&#039;s from planetblue.ith.intel.com which it turns out is Intel employee blogs from their internal social network. It would be awesome to have a backlink from the Intel domain, but I&#039;ve got a gut feeling this one will not count.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://townsend.bunksite.com/google-ignoring-backlinks-webmaster-tools-might-help-well-sometimes/#comment-1085">Scott Shockley</a>.</p>
<p>Scott, thanks for the reply! I just found the strangest backlink and I&#8217;ve been searching all over to find out if it will count for anything. I&#8217;m not sure if Google can even see the page I was linked from because I can&#8217;t see it. It&#8217;s from planetblue.ith.intel.com which it turns out is Intel employee blogs from their internal social network. It would be awesome to have a backlink from the Intel domain, but I&#8217;ve got a gut feeling this one will not count.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Scott Shockley		</title>
		<link>https://townsend.bunksite.com/google-ignoring-backlinks-webmaster-tools-might-help-well-sometimes/#comment-1085</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Shockley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 17:11:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchinfluence.com/?p=5849#comment-1085</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Israel, I think it&#039;s really no indication of whether or not they&#039;re using the juice. There is a lot of debate about this. I personally think that the nofollow attribute on blog comments does what it was intended to do, and prevents the flow of pagerank. If you have a bunch of diggs (which are nofollow), however, even though it doesn&#039;t necessarily flow PR, Google still sees those as votes for your site, and it&#039;s favorable. The funny thing about nofollow though is that, contrary to the name, it seems like Google crawlers follow nearly everything, because they want the biggest index. I have definitely used nofollow links in the past as the sole means of getting a page indexed, but not for getting a page ranked.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Israel, I think it&#8217;s really no indication of whether or not they&#8217;re using the juice. There is a lot of debate about this. I personally think that the nofollow attribute on blog comments does what it was intended to do, and prevents the flow of pagerank. If you have a bunch of diggs (which are nofollow), however, even though it doesn&#8217;t necessarily flow PR, Google still sees those as votes for your site, and it&#8217;s favorable. The funny thing about nofollow though is that, contrary to the name, it seems like Google crawlers follow nearly everything, because they want the biggest index. I have definitely used nofollow links in the past as the sole means of getting a page indexed, but not for getting a page ranked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Israel Kendall		</title>
		<link>https://townsend.bunksite.com/google-ignoring-backlinks-webmaster-tools-might-help-well-sometimes/#comment-1084</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Israel Kendall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 20:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchinfluence.com/?p=5849#comment-1084</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;SEO Dominatrix&quot;, that&#039;s hilarious! I notice links showing up in webmaster tools from major sites that are known for being &quot;nofollow&quot;. Does the link showing up in webmaster tools mean that Google has ignored the nofollow attribute and given my site search juice for the link?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;SEO Dominatrix&#8221;, that&#8217;s hilarious! I notice links showing up in webmaster tools from major sites that are known for being &#8220;nofollow&#8221;. Does the link showing up in webmaster tools mean that Google has ignored the nofollow attribute and given my site search juice for the link?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Scott Shockley		</title>
		<link>https://townsend.bunksite.com/google-ignoring-backlinks-webmaster-tools-might-help-well-sometimes/#comment-1083</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Shockley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 14:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchinfluence.com/?p=5849#comment-1083</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I hear what you&#039;re saying Chris. You have probably heard about the JC Penny SEO scandal in which they became the #1 result for very general searches like black dress by getting anchor text links from thousands of unrelated and spammy directories. What I&#039;ve been screaming since day 1 post-panda is how ridiculous it is when scrapers outrank the site from which the content originated (here is a good post about it: http://www.seomoz.org/blog/postpanda-your-original-content-is-being-outranked-by-scrapers-amp-partners ). Hopefully the Googlers will soon see the error of their ways. Admission of guilt is the first, and most difficult step.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hear what you&#8217;re saying Chris. You have probably heard about the JC Penny SEO scandal in which they became the #1 result for very general searches like black dress by getting anchor text links from thousands of unrelated and spammy directories. What I&#8217;ve been screaming since day 1 post-panda is how ridiculous it is when scrapers outrank the site from which the content originated (here is a good post about it: <a href="http://www.seomoz.org/blog/postpanda-your-original-content-is-being-outranked-by-scrapers-amp-partners" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.seomoz.org/blog/postpanda-your-original-content-is-being-outranked-by-scrapers-amp-partners</a> ). Hopefully the Googlers will soon see the error of their ways. Admission of guilt is the first, and most difficult step.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Chris		</title>
		<link>https://townsend.bunksite.com/google-ignoring-backlinks-webmaster-tools-might-help-well-sometimes/#comment-1082</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 01:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchinfluence.com/?p=5849#comment-1082</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I really dont think google does much about good or bad back links, I&#039;ve had	a well research website up sice the late 90&#039;s, doctors, professors, researchers have all commented on how informative it is and then I have a competitor who site is basically scraped/spun content and back links to basically user account details in forums and it is right up there with mine and has been so for about a year.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really dont think google does much about good or bad back links, I&#8217;ve had	a well research website up sice the late 90&#8217;s, doctors, professors, researchers have all commented on how informative it is and then I have a competitor who site is basically scraped/spun content and back links to basically user account details in forums and it is right up there with mine and has been so for about a year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: SearchCap: The Day In Search, April 26, 2011		</title>
		<link>https://townsend.bunksite.com/google-ignoring-backlinks-webmaster-tools-might-help-well-sometimes/#comment-1081</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SearchCap: The Day In Search, April 26, 2011]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 21:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchinfluence.com/?p=5849#comment-1081</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] Is Google Ignoring Your Backlinks? Webmaster Tools Can (Maybe) Help (Sometimes), www.searchinfluence.com [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Is Google Ignoring Your Backlinks? Webmaster Tools Can (Maybe) Help (Sometimes), <a href="http://www.searchinfluence.com" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.searchinfluence.com</a> [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: townsend.bunksite.com @ 2026-06-16 09:24:27 by W3 Total Cache
-->